Surface Analysis
You will need to discuss with your doctor for complete information regarding the potential risks and features about using Viagra generic viagra For medications found in the U . s ., please view the There are no adequate studies in females for determining infant risk when using this medication during breastfeeding buy cialis cheap. argaiv1606
- Chemical Analysis of Surfaces
|
|
- Contamination Analysis of Surfaces
|
- Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
|
- Mapping Distribution of Species
|
- Transmission Electron Microscopy
|
|
|
- Quatitative Surface Analysis
|
- Failure Analysis of Thin Film Devices
|
- X-Ray Photo-electron Spectroscopy (XPS)
|
- Auger Electron Spectroscopy
|
|
|
|
|
- Depth Composition Profile Analysis
|
- Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy
|
|
|
|
- Surface Roughness Determination
|
- Electrochemical (AC & DC) Analysis
|
|
|
|
- Metallurgical Evaluations
|
- Secondary ion mass spectroscopy
|
|
|
- Nomarski Interference Contrast
|
- Scanning Electron Microscopy
|
- Monitoring the Continuity of Surface Coatings
|
|
|
|
Surface contamination is the premier cause of bonding failure in many areas. From paint adhesion to galvanizing, from contact cement to chemical vapor deposition of thin metal films, surface contamination is the most common “fly in the ointment.” The contamination is usually in an extremely thin layer, perhaps even a mono-atomic layer. Normal chemical analysis will not detect these thin layers.
Consider this problem: let’s say you had a lot of sheet steel for galvanizing. The last step in preparing the steel for galvanizing was to pass it thru a rinse tank. Unbeknownst to you, a maintenance worker had dropped into the tank a wrench which had been lubricated with silicone grease. Of course, some of the grease rose to the surface of the rinse water and formed a very thin film there. And just as surely, some of that silicone was picked up on the surface of your otherwise clean steel. So when the galvanizing process took place, the areas covered by the silicone bonded less well or not at all with the zinc layer, and the zinc in those areas subsequently bubbled and peeled off. Your customer comes to you wanting to know what happened. You are mystified and turn to MATCO for an answer.
MATCO would review the local production process, take samples as appropriate and begin to narrow down the possible problem areas. Soon Auger spectroscopy would reveal the presence of excess carbon and silicon on the interfaces between zinc and steel, pointing to the problem. If sufficient material remained, FTIR spectroscopy would pin down the silicone as the culprit.
|
Testing 
